There is No Unmarked PERSON
Tannen's famous piece "There is No Unmarked Woman" talks about how no matter what women do -- or don't do -- they will be "marked" in one way or another. I agree with this, but only to an extent. Her logic for her argument is that people will always try and judge women based on their makeup, outfit, and jewelry. But is this not true with men as well? In the example she gave in her piece, she describes her male colleagues as wearing "brown or blue slacks and nondescript shirts of light colors" and calls this unmarked. However, isn't this business attire somewhat marked as well? It marks them as professional and formal in an academic setting. Even in high school, wearing a certain style of clothing can mark you regardless of gender. For example, wearing designer clothing marks you as popular and potentially a jock, while wearing semiformal clothes could mark you as a nerd. But the discrepancy Tannen tries to focus on lies in the extent to which t...